Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Bankruptcy Judge Declares W's Policy and Proxy Morally Bankrupt

From Chron.com via AP with a hat tip to First-draft:

WASHINGTON — A judge who usually constrains his opinions to the technicalities of bankruptcy law broke from habit last week and denounced U.S. policy on the detention of "enemy combatants" as "the tactics of the old Soviet Union."

In an e-mail message to National Public Radio that was read aloud on NPR's "Morning Edition" program Friday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Leif Clark attacked the views of a former Bush administration official who had framed the White House policy on the detention of suspected terrorists. The official, John Yoo, argued that such prisoners are ineligible for the protections of the Geneva Conventions.

"The very idea of holding anyone without trial, without the right to see the evidence that was used to justify naming them an enemy combatant, and depriving them of the ability to challenge why they're even there, is so repugnant to a constitutional democracy that I'm shocked this man actually claims to be defending American values," Clark said in the e-mail. "These are the tactics of the old Soviet Union, not of a country that stands for freedom and the rule of law."
Yep.

Mr. Pink: The Best Mechanic

I fail to comprehend the loyalty of many towards a Republican party currently held in contempt.

The rationale seems to be "I don't want to abandon my party. I've invested X amount of years in supporting them, and while I currently disagree with them, I will still vote for them because I hope to one day reclaim MY party."

Yes, it's important to find candidates with whom you agree. Yes, it's important to fight for your party. But, IF your party is failing you, don't vote for them until they have EARNED your vote.

Because as long as you continue to take your car to the service
station who doesn't fix it, your car will never run properly. The
ONLY way to get your car to work properly is to take it to a service station who WILL fix it, even if that service station does other stuff with which you don't agree. If your goal is to fix your car, then you should go to the best mechanic.

Sure, you feel bad leaving the service station you've gone to over the years, but if you and others don't quit getting your car fixed there, that service station won't realize they need to hire new mechanics. They'll keep thinking they're doing a good job.

And, IF that service station cares about you as a customer, they will work even harder trying to win back your patronage. Then, you can feel good about taking your car there again.

Monday, October 09, 2006

Meet the New Russia, Same as the Old Russia..

From the Sydney Morning Herald:

A RUSSIAN journalist renowned for probing corruption and the brutality of Russia's military campaign in Chechnya has been gunned down and killed in the lobby of her apartment building.

Anna Politkovskaya, 48, who had chronicled nearly every major story in Russia in the past decade, was killed on Saturday. Her reports often clashed with official versions of such events as the hostage crisis at a theatre in Moscow in 2002 and the bloody end of a school siege in Beslan in 2004.

The mother of two drew a large crowd at the Sydney Writers' Festival in May, where she spoke about her book A Dirty War: A Russian Reporter in Chechnya.

She was a harsh critic of President Vladimir Putin's rule and was working on a story about torture in Chechnya, where a Kremlin-backed strongman has all but routed a separatist movement that sparked two bloody wars, but at a cost to Russia that has yet to be measured. The article was to be published Monday, according to her newspaper, Novaya Gazeta, one of the few independent media outlets in Russia.

The former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, who is said to be concerned about the increasing lack of pluralism in the country, recently became a minority shareholder in the newspaper.

"It is a savage crime against a professional and serious journalist and a courageous woman," Mr Gorbachev told the Russian news agency Interfax. "It is a blow to the entire democratic, independent press. It is a grave crime against the country, against all of us."

The attack was the highest-profile killing of a journalist in Russia since July 2004, when Paul Klebnikov, an American editor of the Russian edition of Forbes magazine, was gunned down outside his office. Twelve journalists have been killed since Mr Putin came to power in 2000, and most of the cases remain unsolved.

In a world filled with the distractions of AQ, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and Kim Jong Il, it's easy to forget some of the truly powerful and nasty bastards. It's too easy to forget that while $80 a barrel oil helped Chavez and Ahmadinejad, it REALLY helped ol' Pootie-Poot.

"Say, what if I faxed you a headshot of Helen Thomas...?"

Update: Been waiting for the nuclear test verdict all day and it still seems inconclusive. But if it's a success or close to it, I reckon I have to move Kim Jong Il from the category of "distraction" to "truly nasty and powerful bastard" -- the club he's wanted to be a part of all his life.

What Would Denny Do?


From SurveyUSA.com

Joining Technorati

Technorati Profile

Housekeeping. Nothing to see here move along.

Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift: Defender of the US Constitution

"Historically, it always depends on whether we make decisions out of fear or out of convictions. When we make them out of fear, we're rarely proud of them a hundred years later."
---Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift, US Navy

Sometime in the spring of 1976, in the 8th grade here in Franklin, I was talking to schoolmate Charles Swift on the back steps of the old Middle School where the high school cafeteria and Media Center now stand. Charles told me he had been studying wrestling. My facial expression must have indicated my lack of awe: "Go ahead, try to take me down", he said.

I gave it a shot and in about two seconds Charles had me pinned.

"Let me try again", I asked.

"Sure!"

This time I went low, grabbing Charles around both knees. Charles maneuvered quickly, I stood to reposition and in a flick, I was on my butt, looking up at his grin and his trademark winsome countenance.

As is the case of most of my former schoolmates, I never saw or spoke to Charles after graduation -- we had attended different high schools. All I remember was reading he had been accepted to the Naval Academy after graduating from Franklin High School in 1980.

He graduated from the Naval Academy in 1984 and from Seattle Law School in 1994. All told, Charles has 18 years in service to the Navy, 11 of them on the Judge Advocate General's Corps.

In March of 2006, Charles got to wrestle a most formidable opponent in the most august legal arena. The opponent, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld; the arena, the US Supreme Court; the case: Guantanamo Bay detainee Salim Hamdan vs Donald Rumsfeld.

Charles had been tapped for the tough duty of defending Hamdan in the spring of 2003. As he told Esquire Magazine: "The guy who gave me the job said he wanted fighters."

They got the right guy.

Civilian attorney Neal Kaytal actually argued the case in front of the Court but it was Charles who had gotten it that far. Hamdan, a Yemeni national (with a fourth-grade education who claims he never joined Al Qaeda and never fought anyone), was Osama bin Laden's former driver and was charged with conspiracy to commit terrorism. The case was about the nature of the military commissions set up by the Bush Administration to try the Guantanamo detainees. Specifically, Swift and his co-counsels argued that the commissions violated the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions.

The Supreme Court agreed with Charles Swift.

The Court found that evidence gained through torture and unsworn testimony (including hearsay) was a violation of the UCMJ. The Court found that the commission mechanism which allowed for "secret evidence" -- evidence which could never be examined by a defendant and his attorney was a violation. The Court found that the prohibition on a defense attorney from even discussing certain evidence was a violation. The Court found that the lack of a true appellate process (all appeals would be heard within the Executive Branch only) was a violation.

The Court concluded that since the military commissions do not meet the requirements of the Uniform Code of Military Justice or of the Geneva Convention, the commissions are in violation of the laws of war and therefore cannot be used to try Hamdan or his fellow detainees.

What does Swift have to say about all this?

Before the case reached the Supreme Court, Swift told Esquire magazine, "What became clear is that the president had determined to deviate from past practices. They were determined to make up their own rules."

The day the decision was handed down, Swift was interviewed by Hardball's Chris Matthews:

MATTHEWS: What about the charge made recently, just a couple minutes ago by Kate O‘Beirne of the “National Review,” that people who fight us who are not in uniform, who do not represent countries who are party to the Geneva Convention shouldn‘t be free riders? They shouldn‘t get Geneva Convention treatment. They should be treated like thugs.

SWIFT: Well, you know, if you‘re looking at it from that way, we have a lot of criminals here in this country. And to prejudge anyone that we capture outside the country as a thug, why are we having a trial in the first place? We‘ve already decided they were guilty.

What the Supreme Court said is you have the trial first, you use the procedures that are set up under international law, and then you decide whether they‘re a thug. You don‘t make the thug determination going in.

{snip}

MATTHEWS: I only have a minute here, sir, and I appreciate your position, and I‘m being tough with you because there is another side to this argument. Let me ask you, do you believe that people who fight us as terrorists deserve Geneva Convention treatment?

SWIFT: It‘s not whether they deserve it or not. It‘s how we conduct ourselves. It has to do where if we say that our opponent can cause us not to follow the rules anymore, then we‘ve lost who we are. We‘re the good guys. We‘re the guys who follow the rule and the people we fight are the bad guys and we show that every day when we follow the rules, regardless of what they do. It‘s what sets us apart. It‘s what makes us great and in my mind, it‘s what makes us undefeatable, ultimately."
Such eloquence and such passion for the rule of law are lacking in our present situation. And now it seems that the Department of Defense is trying to inculcate more fear in the hearts and minds of those who have such a passion and clear vision for right and wrong for today I read this sad footnote:

"Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift has been passed over for promotion and must soon leave the military according to the military's "up-or-out" promotion system."

Not one to be pinned, Charles effortlessly broke the hold that a morally derelict Secretary of Defense attempted by proxy as the Seattle Times informs us:
"It was a pleasure to serve," said Swift, who added that he would defend Salim Hamdan again, even if he knew he would have to leave the Navy earlier than he wanted.

"All I ever wanted was to make a difference — and in that sense, I think my career and personal satisfaction has been beyond my dreams," he said.

Swift, a Seattle University Law School graduate, also said he will continue to defend Hamdan as a civilian. The Seattle law firm of Perkins Coie, which provided pro-bono legal work in Hamdan's habeas corpus petition, has agreed to support Swift's defense of Hamdan in civilian life, he said.

In the opinion of Washington, D.C., attorney Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice, Swift was "a no-brainer for promotion," given his devotion to the Navy, the law and his client.

But, he said, Swift is part of a long line of Navy defense lawyers "of tremendous distinction" who were not made full commander and "had their careers terminated prematurely."

"He brought real credit to the Navy," said Fidell. "It's too bad that it's unrequited love."
Well, maybe some in the Navy, or, more likely, some in the Administration don't love him but I have the deepest respect and admiration for Charles Swift, for his passion, for his service, for his sense of history, and for his abiding faith that the moral high ground is the only place to win this current war.

And I couldn't be more proud than to have been tossed on my can by this man.

Staff Sergeant Carlos Dominguez, Age 57, Husband, Father of Three, KIA Bagdad

Last week, when I was watching This Week with George S., I did what I normally do when the names of the fallen soldiers scroll by - I kept two questions in mind -- what are the ages and where are they from?

Nineteen hits harder than 35 because as a high-school teacher, I identify with the teens and I have former students who are in the theater of battle. Is a soldier less important if he or she is from California? Absolutely not, But, again, it hits harder when I see Anderson, SC and Seneca, SC -- two little towns who used to have a thriving textile economy and are right down the road from where I grew up but have fallen on tough times.

This weekly ritual did not prepare me for what I saw last week: a fallen soldier who was 57. I was stunned. Yes, I had seen the news accounts of older soldiers on reserve being called up. But this was different. A fifty-seven year old man was in one of the most dangerous of combat situations and was killed.

Looking over his official military bio, one sees that he was drafted in 1969 and served for 15 years in the U.S. Army Pacific, Republic of Korea, the U.S. Army South, Panama, the 2nd Infantry Division, Republic of Korea and the 3rd Armored Division, Germany all with no apparent combat. He then retired to civilian life with his wife in Savannah in 1984.

It would appear that September 11 did indeed change Staff Sergeant Carlos Dominguez as he, at age 52, in September 2001, "voluntarily enlisted into the U.S. Army Reserve as a chemical operations specialist assigned to the 366th Chemical Company, Fort Stewart, Ga., a subordinate unit of the 81st Regional Readiness Command. During his time with the 81st RRC, Dominguez mobilized with the 414th Chemical Company from Orangeburg, S.C., in support of Operation Enduring Freedom."

How does he end up in Bagdad? "In December 2005, Dominguez was transferred from the 81st RRC into the U.S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (Airborne) where he was trained as a civil affairs specialist. He deployed shortly thereafter to Iraq in support of the Global War on Terrorism."

And on September 23rd, his Humvee struck an IED and he was killed.

His daughter, Lisa, recounted that her father would sing her Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, changing "Lucy" to "Lisa", and said that her father ""gave with his whole heart."

"His wife said that as a civil affairs specialist, Dominguez was helping Iraqis rebuild and was proud of his work.

She says he knew his work was dangerous, but that he believed strongly in it."

There is a guestbook at legacy.com where one can leave condolences. All the ones left for Staff Sergeant Carlos Dominguez were from the families of other fallen soliders. This one was typical:

October 1, 2006

To the Family of Staff Sgt. Carlos Dominguez:

My heart breaks again as I sign yet another guest book of another courgeous young soldier who gave their life so selflessly. I wish I never found myself in a position to have to sign another guestbook for the rest of my life. We lost a son 12/1/05 and it seems like yesterday.

I know first hand there are no words right now that will bring you the comfort and peace you need. Just know that you are not alone. My heart, thoughts, and prayers are with you all as you mourn this loss. We don't know each other, will probably never meet, but will forever be united in the loss of our Heroes.

We have, unfortunately joined a group none of us wanted to join, an ever-growing group of families in this situation. May God grant you peace and strength to get through this and be able once again to smile at a memory rather than have only the tears that flow so easily now. To be so proud of your loved one and so saddened at the same time is a mix of emotions very difficult to deal with.

I am sorry that I never knew your soldier personally, but none of these courageous men and women will be forgotten. They will never be able to be replaced, but sometime, someday your loving memories will help to sustain you. This courageous soldier will forever now be your Angel watching over you all for the rest of your lives. It's what brings me some measure of peace and comfort and I hope it will you as well. To his family and friends in pain, I offer this comfort: When you find yourself in that dark sorrowful place, think not only of how you will miss him, but instead recall the years, days, hours and minutes gifted to you by his presence. The one thing that cannot be taken from you is those wonderful memories that now will mean more than ever.

If you ever want to talk, I'm only an e:mail away and would love for you to tell me more about your Hero. God Bless this courageous soldier and family.
Pam Adams (SFC Brent Adams, KIA 12/1/05 Ramadi, Iraq)
redsandstuff2006@yahoo.com
(Millersville, PA )
So much anguish....

Enter the Grownups, Stage Right....

In my dreams, I am President. And I frequently assemble whom my actual cabinet and kitchen cabinet would be. I'd have to have Newt in a closet to come out and spar and provide some creativity -- as long as I could put him back in a closet. I'd keep a toe on the conventional and have David Gergen somewhere (four presidents can't be wrong). And I'd have to have this guy, James Baker, somewhere in the picture.

In Baker we have probably the best Secretary of State of the past 45 years. His assemblage of the coalition for Desert Storm was a masterpiece in diplomacy and persuasion, in stark, glaring contrast to the pretend coalition put together for Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Is Baker slimy? Yep, he's slick, way slicker than Bill Clinton. He engineered a Presidency out of the Florida mess of hanging chads, butterfly ballots, and the busted voting machines as a gift to his long-time partner, George H. W. Bush. And a like a Corvette given to a 16 year-old boy, the father and the salesman have had second thoughts about the amount of power and muscle they jointly conveyed to a reckless pig-head.

And so now, the consummate fixer, like Henry Clay in the twilight of his career and life making his third successful attempt to keep the country from going to war in 1850, Baker is back for one, probably last, fix of a nation in crisis.

Yesterday, he spoke to George Stephanopolous as covered here by the NYTimes:
James A. Baker III , the Republican co-chairman of a bipartisan commission assessing Iraq strategy for President Bush, said today that he expected the group to depart from Mr. Bush’s call to “stay the course.”

In an interview on the ABC News program “This Week,” Mr. Baker said, “I think it’s fair to say our commission believes that there are alternatives between the stated alternatives, the ones that are out there in the political debate, of ‘stay the course’ and ‘cut and run.’ ”

Mr. Baker, who served Mr. Bush’s father as secretary of state and White House chief of staff, did explicitly reject a rapid withdrawal from Iraq, which he said would only invite Iran, Syria and “even our friends in the gulf” to fill the power vacuum.

While heading the commission, Mr. Baker has been talking to President Bush regularly and is unlikely to issue suggestions that the president has not tacitly approved. The independent panel was requested by Congress. Today, he was asked about statements last week by the Republican chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Senator John W. Warner of Virginia, who said Iraq was “drifting sideways” and urged consideration of a “change of course” if the Iraqi government cannot restore order in two or three months.

Asked if he agreed with that timetable, Mr. Baker said: “Yes, absolutely. And we’re taking a look at other alternatives.”

What really got my attention in the interview was Baker's rather plain account of telling the world that Junior has it quite wrong when it comes to diplomatic chess:

“I believe in talking to your enemies,” he said in an interview on the ABC News program “This Week,” noting that he made 15 trips to Damascus, the Syrian capital, while serving Mr. Bush’s father as secretary of state.

“It’s got to be hard-nosed, it’s got to be determined,” Mr. Baker said. “You don’t give away anything, but in my view, it’s not appeasement to talk to your enemies.”

Watch for the Baker Commission to make its move right after the election. And watch for most of the presidential candidates of both parties to try to grab the Baker-Hamilton-(Warner) baton first.

Friday, October 06, 2006

"Shoot Me First"

Chap and I rarely agree.

But the courage demonstrated by the Amish children this past week brings us together. Courage in its rawest, purest form.

The oldest of the five Amish girls shot dead in a Pennsylvania schoolhouse is said to have stepped forward and asked her killer to "Shoot me first," in an apparent effort to buy time for her schoolmates.

Rita Rhoads, a midwife who delivered two of the victims, told ABC News' Law and Justice Unit that she learned of 13-year-old Marian Fisher's plea from Fisher's family.

What's more, Fisher's 11-year-old sister, Barbie, who survived the shooting, allegedly asked the gunman, Charles Carl Roberts IV, to "Shoot me second," Rhoads said.

"They were amazing," Rhoads said, "absolutely amazing. There was a tremendous amount of calm and courage in that schoolroom."

"Marian, the oldest one, did ask to be shot first," Rhoads said. "The faith of their fathers really was embedded in them. … How many adults are willing to do that? Not many."

One of Chap's commenters made the compelling point that the affected Amish community has set up a fund for the family of killer.

I can't remember nor fathom more powerful examples of love.

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Mr Pink: Breaking the Bondage of Either/Or

Victoria: Well, you're right. I'm terrible. I know I'm terrible. I look at the mirror and I'm ashamed. Maybe I should quit. I just can't seem to do anything right.

Joe Gideon: Listen. I can't make you a great dancer. I don't even know if I can make you a good dancer. But, if you keep trying and don'tquit, I know I can make you a better dancer. I'd like very much to do that. Stay?

Victoria: Are you going to keep yelling at me?

Joe Gideon: Probably

-- Bob Fosse/Joe Gideon(played by Roy Schieder) in
ALL THAT JAZZ.


So often I have used a variation of that line with my children.

And, it has worked!!

I recently saw an interview with the guy who wrote, "Blind Faith." It was about a black boy going no where fast with very few options who was later adopted by a wealthy, white family. And, while it breaks my heart that it had to be a WHITE family who really helped this boy,
that's the fact.

But, this story is really about the power of nurture over nature. And I yammer on about that all the time. It's no secret that Bob and I took children who had experienced severe nutritional, intellectual stimulation, and emotional support deficits and helped them become two incredible, healthy, smart, and centered people, just by providing some basic stability, some good nutrition, some boundaries and some love. And, when I work with my children, I often say, "I don't know if I can make you great, but I do know I can make you better!"

And, now I wonder how often kids hear that. It seems like the options are either success or failure - no middle ground -- no chance to be rewarded for improvement. Kids are either 'great' or a 'disappointment.' That's what the kids see anyway -- that's how kids perceive their worth.

The Mountain Philosopher chimes in:

I totally agree with the sentiments of Mr. Pink here. As a teacher, I see that for so many students, they either see themselves as complete successes or complete failures -- they either see no need for growth or no possibility for the same. So many of my high achievers are intensely risk-averse -- they can't bear the thought that they might be less than stellar at something. And many low-achieving students, having accepted this devastating either/or paradigm, won't try, as a they want to relegate themselves to the "failure" bin.

Nothing is more rewarding to this teacher as getting the straight-A kid to see possibilities for growth and to throw caution to the wind in order to try new things. And nothing is more rewarding than to get the kid with low self-esteem to start to acquire new found analytical skills and knowledge and beam with pride when she's able to go toe-to-toe with the class star in an argument.

Life, Liberty, and the Right to Cut & Paste

Future Members of the Ruling Class
Photo Credit:
By Katherine Frey -- The Washington Post


"So, like, I think, you know, Sparknotes and Pink Monkey are sooo kewl, like they can save you so much time doing those stupid papers and stuff. And, like, my English teacher wanted to see if I, like, plagiarized it using that Turnitin sevice, and I was, like, "DUDE!, you can't do that -- it's like in the Constitution that you can't -- I know 'cuz I did this paper on the Constitution last year. And, like, it's in the First Amendment, the right to cut and paste. You know, even the Constitution itself is like totally plagiarized and nobody cared about that. This school is sooooo fascist, man. The teachers act like we're all gonna steal -- it's not like we're black or Mexican dude."

From The Washington Post:

When students and administrators face off over academic policy, it's a safe bet which side will usually win. But a student uprising at McLean High School this fall over an anti-cheating initiative had an unusual outcome.

The students won. Sort of.

School officials had planned to require students in all grades to submit essays and other assignments to the for-profit service known as Turnitin, which polices papers for plagiarism. But after a group of seniors circulated a petition against the initiative, generating headlines, the administration eased the mandate a bit. It now will require only ninth- and 10th-grade English and social studies classes to use Turnitin. The requirement will be phased in for juniors and seniors in coming years.

Turnitin, based in Oakland, Calif., checks each student's work against a database of more than 22 million papers written by students around the world, as well as online sources and electronic archives of journals. Some McLean High students objected to having their essays added automatically to the massive database, calling it an infringement of intellectual property rights.

The service is used by more than 6,000 academic institutions in 90 countries, including more than three-fourths of Fairfax high schools, as well as others in Loudoun, Arlington, Montgomery and Prince George's counties. Fairfax school officials said they are confident Turnitin does not violate student rights. But they acknowledged that student complaints prompted them to go more slowly.

"This is not backing off," said Fairfax County schools spokesman Paul Regnier. "We're not saying we're not going to do this at McLean. We believe our legal status is adequate, and we expect that it's going to be used. It's being used all over the world."

Some students who spearheaded the protest said yesterday they aren't satisfied. Their group, known as the Committee for Students' Rights, plans to hand out fliers outlining their position at an upcoming Parent Teacher Student Association meeting. They have collected about 1,200 signatures on a petition against mandatory use of the service.

"It seems they pretty much changed the policy so they don't have to deal with the people who are protesting it," said Nicholas Kaylor, 17, a senior. "Until there is a clear opt-out option for everyone, we're not going to back down."

Chelsea Shalhoup, 15, a sophomore, said she is not happy Turnitin will be used when the second quarter starts next month.

"I feel like I have to prove I'm not cheating," she said. "I can't just be trusted to say I didn't cheat in the first place."

I think I push the envelope on the side of maximum protection of civil liberties -- for everyone, not just adults. But I'm having a hard time understanding the kids' argument. Their privacy isn't being invaded -- the teacher is just checking to see if they have done their own work using a method from a host of options. If I were teaching in McLean, VA and the administration persisted in their lack of spine, I could easily require students to take a quiz on their own paper, or describe where they got their information (what was the color of the cover of the book and so on).

I'm flabbergasted by what the students see as a right and the total capitulation by the adults.

UPDATE: But I would be pretty naive to be flabbergasted by the whims of the McLean youth and the enabling adults around them. The New Republic lays it all out:

McLean covers just 18 square miles and has a population of 40,000. But it is packed with the people who impeached Bill Clinton, elected George W. Bush, launched the Iraq war, and have now learned to make millions from their association with government. Some are famous--people like Bill Kristol and Colin Powell, Scooter Libby and Newt Gingrich, several current and former Republican senators, and Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia. Dick Cheney once owned a McLean townhouse--until he sold it to Bush's 2000 campaign manager, Joe Allbaugh. Less well-known are the countless lobbyists, lawyers, and businessmen whose names rarely turn up in The Washington Post and who like it that way--people like super-lobbyist Ken Duberstein, Ronald Reagan's former chief of staff; Frank Carlucci, former chair of the Carlyle Group, the notorious global private equity firm with close ties to the Bush family; and Dwight Schar, a construction mogul who is currently finance chairman of the Republican National Committee.

These people live in a leafy suburb among landmarks that neatly represent the modern GOP era: McLean Bible Church, a holy destination for GOP senators and Bush aides; the storied Saudi Arabian ambassador's personal compound; and the forbidden palace of CIA headquarters. ("Never accidentally turn in," Edwina cautions. Legend has it that many an illegal-immigrant housekeeper who did has never been seen again.) When Bush rushed to open a presidential transition office during the 2000 Florida recount, Cheney had his daughter scout out locations in McLean, and it was from there that the Bush team would lay its symbolic claim to the White House.

Ahhh. To be part of the Entitled Class. Where I can stick out my petulant bottom lip when asked for a bare minimum of accountability. Where I can steal other's work and pass it off as my own in order to get into the Ivy League or my safety school of UVA where I belong, apart from the Great Unwashed who must be held to account.

Apples indeed, don't fall far from the tree.

Mr. Pink Explains Iraq to Her Daughter

I was talking to my husband Bob about the big increase in casualties in Iraq.

My 10-year-old daughter asked, "Tell me again why we are in a war."

I very objectively lay out Bush's case (well, one of them anyway).

"Iraq is a small country. It's located in the middle of the Middle East. It had a mean dictator, Saddam Hussein. Bush thought we could easily invade this country because we have a much more powerful military than Iraq. He thought the Iraq people would be happy because we got rid of the mean dictator. He thought he could set up permanent military bases in Iraq with support from the Iraq people. That way, the U.S. would be able fight other countries in the Middle East easily. It would also mean that we would have some say over the oil production in Iraq. He thought everyone in Iraq wanted our democracy and our presence. He saw the U.S. as being the good guys."

"I thought we were fighting for freedom. That's what my friends tell me."

"Well, Bush thought that spreading democracy would create freedom for the Iraq people."

"But, here's what's happening:

Let's say a bunch of strangers forced themselves into our home. Let's say they don't speak our language. But, let's say they are able to communicate to us that they will be pitching tents in the middle of our living room, and that they are never going to leave. Now, let's say they are telling us that having them live in our house in a tent in the middle of our living room is good for us.

What would we do? We'd all get together and try to figure out ways to booby-trap the house in order to get rid off them. We'd be very nice to them when we saw them because we wouldn't want to be shot or have our house blown up. But, we'd always be thinking of ways to get rid of them.

And, it wouldn't matter if they were nice to us. We'd still see their guns and be afraid because we couldn't really communicate with them. We'd never trust them. And, we'd also be upset because every day we'd see their tents in the middle of our living room. And, what's worse, they wouldn't just stay in the living room. Sometimes, they would go upstairs and into YOUR room and ask you questions about what you were doing, always carrying a gun.

"This is how the Iraq people feel. Does that sound like freedom to you? Wouldn't you feel like killing them even if you never thought about killing another person before? That's how the Iraq people feel. That's why they are all joining together to fight our soldiers. What's worse is that the soldiers are only following orders. They didn't want to pitch the tent in the middle of our living room, but they were told they had to. No one wins in this situation. But, this is the war we are fighting. It's war which creates enemies -- DAILY."

"And, that is why we keep losing soldiers."

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Didn't get the memo....

DId the GOP Take Foley Hush Money?

If true, then the biggest news so far.

From Crooks & Liars:

An MSNBC segment examines if Rep. Foley made a large contribution to the Republican Party in exchange for silence about sexual messages that Foley sent to House pages. Foley gave $100,000 to the GOP Campaign Committee in July. The large contribution came at same time when Republican House leadership ignored Foley's emails.

MSNBC Political Analyst Craig Crawford is suspicious of Foley's donation. Crawford says, "It's part of a pattern on Capitol Hill where member raise money not just for their own campaigns, but to give money to others, to their colleagues. So that's kind of a common practice in both parties. What was unusual here was how large this contribution was and when it was made. Tom Foley gave $100,000 to the campaign arm of the House Republicans, the National Republican Congressional Committee, at about the time when they were deciding to ignore these emails, this first round of emails they say. A couple of months after they knew about this, suddenly he gives this big donation. It raises the question, 'Did he buy their silence?'"

Monday, October 02, 2006

Focus on the Ballot Box, Dobson-style




Reverend James Dobson, personal buddy of JC, who has been told by the same that Democrats are Satan's Legion while Republicans are saved Christians who are occasionally tempted by Satan's Legion. And the internets.


Foleygate is starting to look like a novelty shop gizmo -- it's a gift that keeps rewrapping itself to provide the recipient with a slightly new gift each time its unwrapped. This version involves Supreme Homophobe and Clinton-Hater James Dobson of the Most Exalted Focus on the Family empire.

Apparently after emerging from his prayer closet, Reverend Dobson directed his lieutenant (Senior Vice President of Government and Public Policy Tom Minnery) to make the following statement on Congressman Foley's behavior towards his youthful temptations: (hat tip: TPMCafe)

"This is not a time to be talking about politics, but about the well-being of those boys who appear to have been victimized by Rep. Foley. If he is indeed guilty of what he is accused of, it is right that he resigned and that authorities are looking into whether criminal charges are warranted. This is yet another sad example of our society's oversexualization, especially as it affects the Internet, and the damage it does to all who get caught in its grasp."
Yepper. The internets made Foley queer AND a pedophile, which would stand to reason since Al Gore invented them. And politics, well, no, as we are near an election Jesus don't want the faithful (that would be the GOP base) to actually think and either stay at the house or, God forbid, vote DEMOCRAT!

Paul Krugman at the NYTimes uncovers when it is a good time to talk about sex and politics for Brother Dobson -- that would be when a Democratic penis is involved:
"When assessing the legacy of Bill Clinton, we can’t overlook his shameful sexual behavior in the Oval Office, and then, his lies under oath to the American people to cover it up. Indeed, it is my belief that no man has ever done more to debase the presidency or to undermine our Constitution -- and particularly the moral and biblical principles upon which it is based -- than has William Jefferson Clinton."
How on Earth (or Heaven) anyone can review the behavior of the Bushies and square their (mis)deeds with "biblical and moral principles" requires of necessity, spiritual pretzel-making in the most hellish of ovens. Such theological contortions would suggest the Dobsonites have clear title to one.

Drudge Shills For Sexual Predator Enablers Inc. (GOP House Leadership)


"My sickness and Tom Foley's
sickness are only this much apart"

Matt Drudge is taking the "blame the victim" game to new heights in the Foley scandal:

From Crooks & Liars:

Clip #1: And if anything, these kids are less innocent — these 16 and 17 year-old beasts…and I've seen what they're doing on YouTube and I've seen what they're doing all over the internet — oh yeah — you just have to tune into any part of their pop culture. You're not going to tell me these are innocent babies. Have you read the transcripts that ABC posted going into the weekend of these instant messages, back and forth? The kids are egging the Congressman on! The kids are trying to get this out of him. We haven't got the whole story on this.

Clip #2: You could say "well Drudge, it's abuse of power, a congressman abusing these impressionable, young 17 year-old beasts, talking about their sex lives with a grown man, on the internet." Because you have to remember, those of us who have seen some of the transcripts of these nasty instant messages. This was two ways, ladies and gentlemen. These kids were playing Foley for everything he was worth. Oh yeah. Oh, I haven't…they were talking about how many times they'd masturbated, how many times they'd done it with their girlfriends this weekend…all these things and these "innocent children." And this "poor" congressman sitting there typing, "oh am I going to get any," you know?

I'd love to hear Hastert & Co.'s comments on Drudge's defense of their inaction. "16 & 17 year-old beasts" -- I'll have to remember that excuse. Poor Tom Foley and poor Denny Hastert, those evil children have ruined their careers.


Why Churchill Opposed Torture

Cigar aficionado and master statesman Winston Churchill

From LA Times (requires free subscription)

Niall Ferguson: Why Churchill Opposed Torture

The British leader understood what President Bush does not: When it comes to prisoners of war, what goes around comes around.
October 2, 2006

LAST WEEK, both houses of Congress approved a bill — the Military Commissions Act — that would permit the indefinite, extrajudicial incarceration of terrorist suspects and their interrogation using torture in all but name. Does that sound shocking? What's really shocking is that this was a compromise measure.

When President Bush signs this bill into law, a category of detainees will come into existence: "unlawful enemy combatants" who, regardless of their nationality, will be liable to summary arrest.

- - - -

Official Japanese policy encouraged brutality toward prisoners of war by applying the Geneva Convention only mutatis mutandis (literally, "with those things having been changed which need to be changed"), which the Japanese translated as "with any necessary amendments."

The amendments in question amounted to this: Enemy prisoners had so disgraced themselves by laying down their arms that their lives were forfeit. Indeed, some Allied prisoners were made to wear armbands bearing the inscription "One who has been captured in battle and is to be beheaded or castrated at the will of the emperor." Physical assaults were a daily occurrence in some Japanese POW camps. Executions without due process were frequent. Thousands of American prisoners died during the infamous Bataan Death March in 1942.

Elsewhere, British POWs were used as slave labor, most famously on the Burma-Thailand railway line. Attempting to escape was treated by the Japanese as a capital offense, though the majority of prisoners who died were in fact victims of malnutrition and disease exacerbated by physical overwork and abuse. In all, 42% of Americans taken prisoner by the Japanese did not survive. Such were the consequences of "amending" the Geneva Convention.

Red-state Republicans may still shrug their shoulders. After all, George W. Bush is no Tojo. Well, maybe not. But even if you don't see any resemblance between Bush's "administrative regulations" and Imperial Japan's "necessary amendments" of the Geneva Convention, consider this purely practical argument: As Winston Churchill insisted throughout the war, treating POWs well is wise, if only to increase the chances that your own men will be well treated if they too are captured. Even in World War II, there was in fact a high degree of reciprocity. The British treated Germans POWs well and were well treated by the Germans in return; the Germans treated Russian POWs abysmally and got their bloody deserts when the tables were turned.

Few, if any, American soldiers currently find themselves in enemy hands. But in the long war on which Bush has embarked, that may not always be the case. The bottom line about mistreating captive foes is simple: It is that what goes around comes around. And you don't have to be a closet liberal to understand that.
The easy poke at Ferguson/Churchill is that Al Qaeda and their ilk, given their "barbaric" value system and lack of membership in the broader community that constitutes Western Civilization/Christendom are unlikely to treat American POWs with any decency regardless of how we treat their detainees/enemy combatants/POWs. That may well be the case.

But it might not. We will have certainly slammed the door to any reasonable expectation of decent treatment -- the international press corps and community will not be able to exert any leverage whatsoever on future captors of Americans in the light of our new pro-torture policy. And more importantly, we cede the moral high ground in what all parties concede will be a long struggle.

And without that moral high ground, how can we possibly see our path clear to victory?

Pink, Campbell, and Anonymous stirring things up!

Most excellent discussion of healthcare taking place regarding Mr. Pink's Healthcare Horror Story in the comments section. Many thanks to Barry from enrevanche from helping this stalled blog git out of the ditch. Step into the ring with yer facts and yer tough skin with Brother Campbell -- remember, them Scots-Irish wuz Born Fighting.

Cupcakes Protected by Texas Legislature

"The right to dispense sugar and processed foods being necessary to classroom control and thus a stable society, Congress shall pass no law abridging the rights of parents and teachers to use cupcakes as rewards."

--Amendment 2a (comes right after the thing on guns; Civics Fer Dummies)

From the LA Times (requires free registration)

Sorry, Cupcake, You're Not Welcome in Class

The Texas Legislature last year passed the so-called Safe Cupcake amendment, which guarantees parents' right to deliver unhealthful treats to the classroom — such as sweetheart candies on Valentine's Day and candy corn on Halloween. Rep. Jim Dunnam sponsored the legislation after a school in his district booted out a father bringing birthday pizzas to his child's class.

"There's a lot of reasons our kids are getting fat," said Dunnam, a Democrat from Waco. "Cupcakes aren't one of them."

Whether cookies, cakes and other birthday treats at school are the culprits or not, however, the nation's children are definitely packing on the pounds.

Nearly 19% of children ages 6 to 11 and more than 17% of adolescents ages 12 to 19 were overweight in 2003-04, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Extra weight carries added health risks, as seen in the increasing childhood diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes, once considered an adult disease.
- - - - -
Although nutritionists endorse promoting healthful eating in schools, some question the logic of making any popular food taboo.

"The more you restrict these special foods — cakes or sweets or whatever — they become even more valued by children. It can almost kind of backfire," said Dr. Nancy Krebs, co-chairwoman of the American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Obesity. "You want to have a kind of pragmatic approach that sweets and desserts are OK in moderation and not put them up on a pedestal.
- - - - -
In August, the district board decided to ban selling unhealthful food from vending machines and prohibit teachers from dishing out candy as a reward. But it granted a reprieve to birthday cupcake parties and cheese-dripping nachos at football games.

"They're trying to appease everyone," complained Noelani Sallings, who has two daughters in the district and is running for the school board in November. "American waistlines are getting larger and larger."
OK. Cupcakes aren't evil. But using food as a reward is bad parenting and bad teaching. We're giving in to laziness and B.F. Skinner. Liberals ought to oppose the "cupcake as reward" on nutritional grounds; conservatives should rail against the brainwashing. If you saw the crap that kids eat at school, what we sell them out of the vending machines to fund club activities, what they choose to buy in the cafeteria, you would want to blow up the cupcakes too I believe.

Last Normal Child




From USA TODAY


Q: Why did you call your book
The Last Normal Child?

A: Because I had this fantasy, as more and more normal kids get psychiatric medication, that eventually the last normal child in the world finally would be brought to me for a prescription.

Q: What are some of the key reasons that more parents are bringing in normal kids to see if they have ADHD or another disorder and should be medicated?

A: For one thing, academic standards are getting increasingly rigorous and ridiculous — at ever-younger ages. Teachers start to complain about the children, especially boys, who can't get with the program.

I used to think parents worried only about kids being good students, getting good jobs and making money. But now there's also this tremendous worry about children's self-image, their self-esteem. And the kids do feel bad, because they know they're disappointing their parents and teacher.

Sometimes children have undiagnosed learning disabilities, not ADHD. Or, they might not be motivated to do academic work. Not every kid is academic, and that can be hard for high-achieving parents. There may be problems at home, or parents may not be disciplining properly, so kids are acting out.


Hat Tip: Marilyn

Rall Toon

Mr. Pink points us to a Ted Rall toon which underscores his healthcare story. Mr. Pink further informs that when he went to pay the $770.00 with a VISA, the pharmacy, unfamiliar with Mr. Pink's history, unsuccessfully tried to demand cash.

No Free Lunch at Wal-Mart

Slacker Sally Threatens Our Collective Standard of Living

Four dollar prescriptions at Wal-Mart seemed like a hell of a deal. And they probably are. But like the DVD players sells for 25 bucks, there's a moral catch. Where is Wal-Mart looking to increase its stagnant or declining profit margins? The NYTimes points the finger:

Wal-Mart to Add Wage Caps and Part-Timers

Wal-Mart, the nation’s largest private employer, is pushing to create a cheaper, more flexible work force by capping wages, using more part-time workers and scheduling more workers on nights and weekends.

- - - -

Investment analysts and store managers say Wal-Mart executives have told them the company wants to transform its work force to 40 percent part-time from 20 percent. Wal-Mart denies it has a goal of 40 percent part-time workers, although company officials say that part-timers now make up 25 percent to 30 percent of workers, up from 20 percent last October.

To some extent, Wal-Mart is simply doing what business strategists recommend: deploying workers more effectively to meet the peaks and valleys of business in their stores. Wall Street, which has put pressure on Wal-Mart to raise its stock price, has endorsed the strategy, with analysts praising the new approach to managing its workers. In the last three years, the stock price has fallen about 10 percent, closing at $49.32 a share on Friday.

- - - -

But Sally Wright, 67, an $11-an-hour greeter at the Wal-Mart in Ponca City, Okla., said she quit in August after 22 years with the company when managers pressed her to make herself available to work any time, day or night. She requested staying on the day shift, but her manager reduced her schedule from 32 hours a week to 8 and refused her pleas for more hours, she said.

“They were trying to get rid of me,” Ms. Wright said. “I think it was to save on health insurance and on the wages.”

Wal-Mart vigorously denies it is pushing out longtime or full-time employees and says its moves will ensure its competitiveness. The company says it gives employees three weeks’ notice of their schedules and takes their preferences into account, but that description differs from those of many workers interviewed. Workers said that their preferences were often ignored and that they were often given only a few days’ notice of scheduling changes.


Look, Sally and you other greeters, if you aren't on call almost 24 hours a day, I can't get the four buck generics and swing the 25 buck DVD player. And more importantly, my retirement portfolio won't earn enough to keep me from being......a Wal-Mart greeter on-call 24/7 when I'm 67.

Get it in gear Sally!

Newt Gay Bashes with GOP Damage Control on Foley

Demonstrating that he still keeps a copy of Machiavelli's The Prince on the nightstand, Newt attempted a bit of spin/damage control on the fact that the Republican most in charge of sexual predator laws at the national level was indeed a sexual predator.

Much more importantly, he was enabled by his House superiors including Speaker Dennis Hastert, who has already had to revise his first statement about Foley: "I was never told he was sending freaky emails to kids" to "I don't remember being told he was sending freaky emails to kids."

What's the Newtster's solution to this devastating blow to turning out the GOP "values" voters in a few weeks? Make it the gay-loving Democrats fault! Witness the modern-Machiavelli in action:

WALLACE: But, during all those months, they left Foley in the House Republican leadership. They left him as the head of the congressional caucus dealing with exploited children. No second thoughts about that?

GINGRICH: Well, you could have second thoughts about it, but I think had they overly aggressively reacted to the initial round, they would have also been accused of gay bashing. I mean, the original notes had no sexual innuendo and the parents did not want any action taken.

WALLACE: Well, how would it have been gay bashing?

GINGRICH: Because it was a male-male relationship. And it had no — there was no proof, there was nothing that I know of in that initial round that would have led you to say in a normal circumstance that this is a predatory person.

Newt knows better but in case you haven't figured it out yet, here's the moral code over here in SaneWorld: consenting sexual relationships between adults, be they heterosexual or homosexual are OK with us. Predatory relationships, where one person is an adult and the other is a juvenile, is NOT OK with us. And, the mountain of evidence would indicate, most sexual predators, like most of the population at large, are indeed heterosexual. And there is nothing ipso facto about a homosexual man being a sexual predator any more than there is a necessary relationship between a heterosexual man and the same flaw.

What the Democrats should be hammering away at today, tomorrow, and every day until the election, is that the GOP leadership constitute a cadre of enablers. They enable the President to tell his lies about Iraq and that hurts people, that enabling allows for the deaths of innocent Iraqi civilians as well as the needless deaths of American servicemen and women. And that same GOP leadership enabled a sexual predator to go about his business unhindered in the nation's Capitol, all so they could hold onto power.

And the best defender they can serve up is a guy who divorced his first wife while she was critically ill and was screwing his secretary while impeaching the President.

They have no shame.

Friday, September 29, 2006

Mr. Pink's Healthcare Horror Story

The reason the hospital released Bob early was because he was able to give himself shots of the blood thinner, Lovenox. Prior to the "procedure", he had to quit taking the Warfarin (blood thinner), so he wouldn't bleed all over the table. After the procedure, it's important to thin out the blood again really fast, so you have to take the Lovenox shots for a few days until you can just go back to the pills.

Very few pharmacies carry Lovenox shots, but the one near the hospital did, so we went there.The area near the hospital is very poor and populated by people of color. As I'm waiting for Bob's prescriptions, one parent after another tried to get prescriptions for their children. And, one after another, they were told their children weren't covered by insurance, so they had to payfull price for the meds. And, one after another said, "That's OK. I know another pharmacy who will fill the prescription (lie). I will just take it there."

There was a consistency in the way they were trying to get medicine for their children. You could tell they drive from pharmacy to pharmacy, trying to get the prescription filled. It was so fucking sad.

Then, it was my turn. Bob's insurance also rejected covering the meds (the doctor didn't call it in). BUT, I didn't care. I KNEW I would get reimbursed given my past success with reluctant insurance companies. And, even if I didn't succeed, it didn't matter because Bob needed this medicine (as I'm sure the children needed theirs). So, I said, "I'll sort it out it later with my insurance company; I'll pay the full price now."

The total was $770.00!!!! If insurance had covered it, the total would have been only $40.That was an eye-opening experience for me. Since we haven't paid full-price retail for any prescription drugs in decades, I had no idea what current prices were. More importantly, I had no idea what the uninsured are expected to pay (when they clearly can't).

I just wanted to tell everyone in the pharmacy that I would pay for their medicine. That's when my stomach really started to hurt. I kept thinking to myself, "Am I in Darfur?!! The only thing missing from this picture were the flies. What medicines are these children not receiving? etc." It was horrible.

I called the insurance company when we got home. They explained about the authorization. Then they said, "You can just take your receipts back to the pharmacist, and they'll give you a refund." I explained that I lived in the sticks, and that I wasn't going to drive back (four hours round-trip) for a refund. I told them that they needed to reimburse me.

"So, you already purchased the medicine?"

"YES! Of course, I did. My husband needed it right away. He was released from the hospital only because he would have access to this medicine. You should be thrilled. You aren't paying for a longer hospital stay."

"Yes, I see here that this medicine is important. OK, we will reimburse you."

Again, I thought, "Even if you have insurance, you could be fucked by the company if you aren't aggressive on the phone (or understand what is being said to you)." After all, the goal of the insurance company is to place as much burden on YOU as they can get away with. It's a disgusting, horrific system. The 'Torture Bill' was passed yesterday, but it's been in effect for so much longer. How can one not cry for our country and our fellow citizens? I hope I never become that callous.

A couple of hours went by and then I had a phone call with the hospital about Bob's situation. I told them that I already paid for his medicine. I told them that what I told the insurance company, ending with, "Of course, I paid -- it was a life or death situation!"

The response from hospital was chilling. In a deadpan voice I heard, "You're in the minority. Most people don't get the medicine."

In other words, what they were saying was, "Like, (YAWN), yeah, we write the prescriptions, but we don't give a shit after the patient leaves."

If Bob hadn't received his medicine, he could have a stroke and/or a heart attack. Then, it would be back to hospital for even more intensive, more costly care. I'd like to know: How many patients INCREASE the cost of healthcare by NOT being able to obtain medicine in a timely fashion? Good God!

Word of God


Click on image to enlarge

I've been reading Bart Ehrman's Misquoting Jesus which is an introduction of sorts into the practice of textual criticism, the art and practice of identifying textual errors to get back to some sort of elusive original to get at the author's original intent or meaning.

In this flow chart, I combined the issues Ehrman discusses, hurdles if you will that keep us from being able to grasp the original New Testament. I took Ehrman's scholarship, combined it with some Bishop Spong's insights, along with some chronology from Thomas Cahill. The point is, is that getting to original words and authorial intent is exceptionally tricky when considering the variables presented in the flow chart.

The stock evangelical and/or fundamentalist response to this issue, is to refer the critic to the power of the Holy Spirit, that the Holy Spirit would steer the reader to make the intended translation of the modern version of Scripture. That's all well and good, but as my friend Dr. Curtis Wood points out, why does it matter what one studies in terms of words on a page if indeed the Holy Spirit operates in this manner? That is a tough question.

Sunday, January 08, 2006

At least they weren't spreading anthrax...


Alito loves the myrrh

From the Wall Street Journal

"Insisting that God "certainly needs to be involved" in the Supreme Court confirmation process, three Christian ministers today blessed the doors of the hearing room where Senate Judiciary Committee members will begin considering the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito on Monday."

"Capitol Hill police barred them from entering the room to continue what they called a consecration service. But in a bit of one-upsmanship, the three announced that they had let themselves in a day earlier, touching holy oil to the seats where Judge Alito, the senators, witnesses, Senate staffers and the press will sit, and praying for each of the 13 committee members by name."

"We did adequately apply oil to all the seats," said the Rev. Rob Schenck, who identified himself as an evangelical Christian and as president of the National Clergy Council in Washington."
Your Capitol Police doing "a heckuva job."

Personal note--

A lifetime ago (1991) when I was managing in the portrait buisness, I was managing two very crazy women -- well, I was managing a dozen crazy women, but these two happenend to be living together. At first, they got along great, both hard-core evengelicals. Then one got a little more evangelical than the other. One returned from a week-long trip on the road to find that the roommate had "annointed" (soaked) all the furniture in the house in annointing oil. She complained only to have the roommate retaliate by putting sugar in her gas tank.

The Jesus in the new NBC show the Book of Daniel is not this crazy.

Friday, January 06, 2006

Warrior Poet: Brian Turner


Many have lamented that the end of the draft, which, democratically brought the poet and novelist into the infantry along with those less inclined to pen prose, would entail that vivid descriptions of the battlefield would be absent from the panorama of modern conflicts.I believe Brian Turner's work readily dispels that concern.

(From the official bio:)
Brian Turner earned an MFA from the University of Oregon and lived abroad in South Korea for a year before serving for seven years in the US Army. He was an infantry team leader for a year in Iraq beginning in November 2003 with the 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division. Prior to that, he was deployed to Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1999 with the 10th Mountain Division.



Here, Bullet

If a body is what you want,
then here is bone and gristle and flesh.
Here is the clavicle-snapped wish,
the aorta's opened valves, that leap
thought makes at the synaptic gap.
Here is the adrenaline rush you crave,
that inexorable flight, that insane puncture
into heat and blood. And I dare you to finish
what you've started. Because here, Bullet,
here is where I complete the word you bring
hissing through the air, here is where I moan
the barrel's cold esophagus, triggering
my tongue's explosives for the rifling I have
inside of me, each twist of the round
spun deeper, because here, Bullet,
here is where the world ends, every time.

Eulogy

It happens on a Monday, at 11:20 A.M.,
as tower guards eat sandwiches
and seagulls drift by on the Tigris River.
Prisoners tilt their heads to the west
though burlap sacks and duct tape blind them.
The sound reverberates down concertina coils
the way piano wire thrums when given slack.
And it happens like this, on a blue day of sun,
when Private Miller pulls the trigger
to take brass and fire into his mouth:
the sound lifts the birds up off the water,
a mongoose pauses under the orange trees,
and nothing can stop it now, no matter what
blur of motion surrounds him, no matter what voices
crackle over the radio in static confusion,
because if only for this moment the earth is stilled,
and Private Miller has found what low hush there is
down in the eucalyptus shade, there by the river.

-- PFC B. Miller (1980-March 22, 2004)
(Turner wrote this poem a few days after Private Miller killed himself. He notes in the NPR interview that when their commanding colonel read the names of the recently fallen in his brigade, that to Turner's chagrin, Miller's name was conspicuously absent from among those memorialized.)


AB Negative (The Surgeon’s Poem)

Thalia Fields is under a grey ceiling of clouds,
just under the turbulance, with anesthetics
dripping from an I.V. into her arm,
and the flight surgeon says The shrapnel
cauterized as it traveled through her
here, breaking this rib as it entered,
burning a hole through the left lung
to finish in her back, and all of this
she doesn’t hear, except perhaps as music—
that faraway music of people’s voices
when they speak gently and with care,
a comfort to her on a stretcher
in a flying hospital en route to Landstuhl,
just under the rain at midnight, and Thalia
drifts in and out of consciousness
as a nurse dabs her lips with a moist towel,
her palm on Thalia’s forehead, her vitals
slipping some, as burned flesh gives way
to the heat of the blood, the tunnels within
opening to fill her, just enough blood
to cough up and drown in, and Thalia,
she sees the shadows of people working
to save her, but she cannot feel their hands,
and she cannot hear them any longer,
and when she closes her eyes
the most beautiful colors rise in darkness,
tangerine washing into Russian blue,
with the droning engine humming on
in a dragonfly’s wings, the island palms
painting the sky an impossible hue
with their thick brushes dripping in green…
But this is all an act of the imagination,
a means of dealing with the obscenity
of war, what loss there is, the inconsolable
grief, the fact that Thalia Fields is gone,
long gone, about as far from Mississippi
as she can get, 10,000 feet above Iraq
with a blanket draped over her body
and an exhausted surgeon in tears,
his bloodied hands on her chest, his head
sunk down, the nurse guiding him
to a nearby seat and holding him as he cries,
though no one hears it, because nothing can be heard
where pilots fly in black-out, the plane
like a shadow guiding the rain, here
in the droning engines of midnight.

Listen to interview with Brian Turner here. (about 7 minutes - includes his reading of the poem Ashbah (transliterates to Ghosts)

Listen to Turner reading What Every Soldier Should Know

Listen to Turner reading Here, Bullet.


A plug on NPR really helps the book sell:
Amazon.com Sales Rank:
Today: #48 in Books Yesterday: #36,003 in Books

Review of Turner's work here. (fairly critical)
Another interesting review.

The New York Times Book Review Editor’s Choice
"…earnest, nonpartisan attention to the terrors as well as to the beauty of ruins."

The New York Times Book Review
"Turner has sent back a dispatch from…the war in Iraq—and deserves our thanks…"

The Globe and Mail
"…written by a veteran whose eye for the telling detail is as strategic as it is poetic."

Library Journal
"Turner attempts to capture the extreme experience of war by depicting the feelings it generates..."

The Franklin Journal
"…a powerful reading experience…"

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Hilarious Blonde Joke



You'll want to pass this gem on to all your blonde friends.

Soldier George

Crawford Terrorist

The Commander-In-Chief and GI Joe wannabee demonstrates his courage and sensitivity after visiting with wounded veterans from the Amputee Care Center of Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas:

"As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself—not here at the hospital, but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won. The cedar gave me a little scratch."

Augie Schroeder

Lance Cpl. Edward "Augie" Schroeder II in Iraq.
(Paul Schroeder - via Washington Post)


"...people say, "He died a hero." I know this is meant with great sincerity. We appreciate the many condolences we have received and how helpful they have been. But when heard repeatedly, the phrases "he died a hero" or "he died a patriot" or "he died for his country" rub raw.


"People think that if they say that, somehow it makes it okay that he died," our daughter, Amanda, has said. "He was a hero before he died, not just because he went to Iraq. I was proud of him before, and being a patriot doesn't make his death okay. I'm glad he got so much respect at his funeral, but that didn't make it okay either."


The words "hero" and "patriot" focus on the death, not the life. They are a flag-draped mask covering the truth that few want to acknowledge openly: Death in battle is tragic no matter what the reasons for the war. The tragedy is the life that was lost, not the manner of death. Families of dead soldiers on both sides of the battle line know this. Those without family in the war don't appreciate the difference."


{snip}


"I am outraged at what I see as the cause of his death. For nearly three years, the Bush administration has pursued a policy that makes our troops sitting ducks. While Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that our policy is to "clear, hold and build" Iraqi towns, there aren't enough troops to do that.


In our last conversation, Augie complained that the cost in lives to clear insurgents was "less and less worth it," because Marines have to keep coming back to clear the same places. Marine commanders in the field say the same thing. Without sufficient troops, they can't hold the towns. Augie was killed on his fifth mission to clear Haditha."


{snip}


"Two painful questions remain for all of us. Are the lives of Americans being killed in Iraq wasted? Are they dying in vain? President Bush says those who criticize staying the course are not honoring the dead. That is twisted logic: honor the fallen by killing another 2,000 troops in a broken policy?"

"I choose to honor our fallen hero by remembering who he was in life, not how he died. A picture of a smiling Augie in Iraq, sunglasses turned upside down, shows his essence -- a joyous kid who could use any prop to make others feel the same way."

Amanpour Wiretapped?


Get yer tinfoil hat out folks.

Check this out from Americablog:

"New York Times reporter James Risen first broke the story two weeks ago that the National Security Agency began spying on domestic communications soon after 9/11. In a new book out Tuesday, "State of War," he says it was a lot bigger than that.

Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Andrea Mitchell sat down with Risen to talk about the NSA, and the run-up to the war in Iraq....

Mitchell: Do you have any information about reporters being swept up in this net?

Risen: No, I don't. It's not clear to me. That's one of the questions we'll have to look into the future. Were there abuses of this program or not? I don't know the answer to that.

Mitchell: You don't have any information, for instance, that a very prominent journalist, Christiane Amanpour, might have been eavesdropped upon?

Risen: No, no I hadn't heard that.

Super-double-mega-kicker -- after the Americablog post ran, MSNBC/NBC purged the transcript of the Amanpour reference.

Americablog goes on to spell out possible implications of an Amanpour wiretap here. (Preview -- she's married to Wesley Clark's and John Kerry's former advisor on foreign affairs -- tap Amanpour and you're theoretically tapping the Clark and Kerry campaign(s)).



Tricky George

The Heretic: A Message of Love and Universal Salvation

Carlton Pearson

I'm a huge fan of Ira Glass's radio program, This American Life, which airs on my local NPR affiliate WCQS on Saturdays and Fridays. Glass's pieces are typically drenched in sarcasm and/or pathos.

One of his last programs in December had no sarcasm but plenty of pathos. And unlike most of his one-hour shows which are typically broken up into 10 - 15 minute segments, this show gave the full hour to one subject, one person, one story -- that of Bishop Carlton Pearson.

Pearson was the "black son" of Oral Roberts and was deeply enmeshed in Roberts' ministry. He broke away but essentially maintained the same Pentecostal message of his spiritual father and mentor. Until a little over a year ago.

Pearson had an epiphany which radically transformed his theology. He embraced a doctrine of universal salvation and discarded the typical Christian view of Hell, which holds that it is a place for non-believers, the unsaved, to gnash their teeth in a fiery eternity. Pearson adopted the view that Hell is indeed here on Earth, on this plane, and is of our making. Hell is a product of man's sadism and/or lack of love.

This theological shift cost him 95% of his followers (20,000 plus in weekly attendance), his pastoral staff, most of his friends, and his physical church. But he has moved on, holding services in a Episcopalian church in downtown Tulsa.

I highly recommend that when you have an hour, to listen to the show. I sat in the car in the driveway to listen to it -- Genna was kind enough to download it for from audible.com and burn it to CD. But you can listen to Pearson's journey and message for free here. (Requires RealAudio).

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Whither Our Sam Ervin?


Senator Sam -- lover and protector of the US Constitution

I got baptized into following political scandal at an early age. In the spring of 1973 as the Ervin Committee was convening, the National Observer, a high-brow predecessor to USA Today, published a double-truck spread of all the Watergate players, complete with bios, allegations, and flow-chart arrows indicating the links among the players. Mom posted it on a closet door next to the television. That summer at our grandparents house, we all watched the hearings as Mom explained what was going on. At age 10, I was engrossed in the unfolding drama.

I remember Ervin's drawl. I remember Howard Baker's "What did the President know and when did he know it?" I remember all the pipes. I remember Ervin's fiery exchange with Erlichman.

Conveniently, the folks at ThinkProgress have published the list of the Abramoff players -- you may want to print and tape it up next to your monitor or TV and make notes as the indictments and/or pleas ensue.

And as the Congress slowly stirs to to investigate Bush's wanton disregard for the 1978 FISA Act (I've linked to the section the President violated) and the Constitution, I thought some of Senator Sam's quotes during the Watergate crisis would remind us of our system of CHECKS and BALANCES:

"Divine Right went out with the American Revolution and doesn't belong to White House aides. What meat do they eat that makes them grow so great? .... I don't think we have any such thing as royalty or nobility that exempts them. ... That is not executive privilege. That is executive poppycock."

"I'm not going to let anybody come down at night like Nicodemus and whisper something in my ear that no one else can hear. That is not executive privilege; it is poppycock."

"As long as I have a mind to think, a tongue to speak, and a heart to love my country, I shall deny that the Constitution confers any autocratic power on the President, or authorizes him to convert George Washington's America into Gaius Caesar's Rome."